PRESIDENT TRUMP.
JOINING US TONIGHT IS HARMEET
SKI
HAI
HARMEETDHILLON.
RNC COMMITTEE WOMAN FOR
CALIFORNIA.
PUBLIC OF THE 2020 TRUMP
ADVISORY COUNSEL.
LET, GET RIGHT TO IT.
AN IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY.
TO THE LIFE OF ME I CAN'T FIND A
CRIME.
I HAVE LOTS OF QUESTIONS FOR THE
DIMMS AND THEIR CONDUCT AND IN
THEIR ALLEGATIONS.
WHAT ABOUT YOU?
>> THE CRIME IS DONALD TRUMP
WINNING THE 2016 ELECTION.
THAT'S A CRIME THEY HAVEN'T GONE
THE OVER AND THEY WILL DO
ANYTHING TO STOP HIM.
THIS RECENT KERFUFFLE IS AN
EXTENSION OF THE RUSSIA
INVESTIGATION THAT WAS FAILED.
IF WE GET PAST THIS ONE THERE
WILL BE ANOTHER AND ANOTHER.
BUT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE AN
ENDLESS SUPPLY OF SPIES, THE
SWAMP CREATURES BURROWED INTO
THE WHITE HOUSE.
SO WE HAVE TO FIGHT HARD TO PUT
A STOP TO THIS, LOU.
LOU: I WOULD HOPE SO.
THE RNC, REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP
ON THE HILL, THEY DON'T SEEM TO
BE FILLED BRIMMING WITH PASSION
TO DEFEND THIS PRESIDENT AND GO
AFTER THE RADICAL DIMMS
PERPETRATING A FRAUD ON THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE AND WHO ARE
RELENTLESSLY AND ABSOLUTELY FROM
EVERY QUARTER ATTACKING THIS
PRESIDENT NONSTOP.
THIS ONE WOULD THINK HAS TO END.
>> THE RNC IS FIGHTING HARD.
ALL THE MATERIAL COMING OUT OF
THE RNC IS CORN IS TENT IN
FIGHTING FOR THE PRESIDENT.
I'M DISAPPOINTED TO SEE OUR
CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN SENATORS
SCURRYING AWAY FROM QUESTIONS
ABOUT THIS.
WE'LL REMEMBER THOSE FOLKS WHEN
THEY COME CALLING FOR
CONTRIBUTIONS.
THIS IS A TIME FOR EVERYBODY TO
STAND TOGETHER.
THIS IS A FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE
OF OUR COUNTRY.
LOU: IT'S NOTHING LESS THAN
THAT.
THE NICETIES FROM THE RINO
REPUBLICANS, I DON'T UNDERSTAND
WHY THE PARTY BOTHERS.
IF THEY HAVE PRINCIPLE OR
COURAGE, THEY ARE WILLING TO
TEST IT.
I WANT TO TURN TO A DEVELOPMENT
THAT IS VERY INTERESTING, AND I
KNOW YOU HAVE BEEN CHECK IT OUT
BECAUSE WE DISCUSSED IT TODAY.
BUT "THE FEDERALIST" PUBLISHING
THIS STORY THAT THE INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITY, SECRETLY, THIS WHOLE
THING IS BASED ON A
WHISTLEBLOWER FOR OUR AUDIENCE.
THE INTEL COMMUNITY SECRETLY
GUTTED THE REQUIREMENT OF
FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE ON THE PART
OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.
THAT HAPPENED SO MYSTERIOUSLY
JUST BEFORE THAT COMPLAINT WAS
FILED.
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THIS
TODAY'S REPORTING FROM A COUPLE
DIFFERENT SOURCES, THE FORM USED
TO REQUIRE AS RECENTLY AS A
MONTH AGO AND LAST YEAR.
THE COMPLAINT BE FIRST-HAND
KNOWLEDGE, IN A NUMBER OF OTHER
OBLIGATIONS.
IT CAN'T BE DIFFERENCES OF
POLICY.
IT HAS TO BE SPECIFIC CRITERIA.
IT DOESN'T COVER THE PRESIDENT,
IT ONLY COVERS WITH HAPPENS IN
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.
THE NEW FORM WHICH IS PUBLISHED
ON THE WEBSITE OF THE DNI FOR
WHISTLEBLOWERS.
IT'S MARKED AUGUST 2019.
IT HAS ELIMINATED THAT
FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE
REQUIREMENT.
AND YOU SEE THAT REFLECTED IN
THE CURRENT COMPLAINT.
IT'S FULL OF SECOND-HAND, PRESS
REPORTS AND MORE.
LOU: A NUMBER OF THE EX FOR
EXAMPLES OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.
AMONGST THE EXPRESSIONS.
I RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM
MULTIPLE OFFICIALS.
OFFICIALS HAVE INFORMED ME,
OFFICIALS WITH DIRECT KNOWLEDGE
OF THE CALL INFORM KNEE, I WAS
TOLD MY WHITE HOUSE OFFICIALS,
AND ON AND ON IT GOES.
IT READS LIKE THE MOST OF
PREPOSTEROUS DOCUMENT.
THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN AT
REQUIREMENT THERE BE FIRST-HAND
EYEWITNESS TESTAMENTS
ACCOMPANYING THAT COMPLAINT.
I HEARD A RUMOR SO I THOUGHT IT
WOULD SHARE IT WITH YOU AND
PLEASE PROCEED.
I DON'T SEE TONIGHT OTHER WAY TO
DEEM WITH IT.
DO YOU -- TO DEAL WITH IT, DO
YOU?
>> THERE IS A GOOD REASON WE
REQUIRE FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE.
IT'S THE MOST OF CREDIBLE AND
MOST OF CLOSE TO THE FACTS.
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE TYPE
OF COMPLAINT WE ARE TALKING
ABOUT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MADE
UNDER LAST YEAR OR EARLIER THIS
YEAR'S RULES.
IT'S SIGNIFICANT THOSE RULES
WERE SECRETLY CHANGED.
ANYBODY WORKING IN THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY,
INCLUDING NOT JUST AN EMPLOYEE,
OR A CONTRACTOR, COULD MAKE A
COMPLAINT THE PRESIDENT
INVOLVING GARBAGE FROM THE
MEDIA, AND THAT HOLDS YOU HAVE
OUR WHOLE GOVERNMENT SNIRT'S ARE
YOU DECK -- THE WHOLE
GOVERNMENT?
THAT'S RIDICULOUS.
LOU: A CIA OFFICER CONDUCT
SURVEILLANCE FOR THE DEEP STATE
INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE DID
EXACTLY THAT GIVEN THE
OPPORTUNITY OF WHAT CHANGED.
YOU CAN'T SAY THE DATE, WE DON'T
KNOW THE DATE.
BUT WE DO NOT WAS PRESUMABLY IN
AUGUST OF THIS YEAR, JUST BEFORE
ALL OF THIS BEGAN.
>> WE NEED TO KNOW THAT.
WE NEED TO KNOW WHEN WAS THAT
CHANGED?
UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY?
THAT'S A KEY QUESTION HERE.
WE HAVE TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF
THIS.