United States Postal Service.
>> Dana: MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS
DATE 2 AND KYLE RITTENHOUSE
TRIAL.
THE JURIES WE WATCHED EVIDENCE
IN THE COURTROOM THE NIGHT OF
THE SHOOTING AND THAT HAPPEN AS
THE DEFENSE PUSHES ONCE AGAIN
FOR A MISTRIAL WITH PROSECUTORS
HELD KEY VIDEO EVIDENCE AND THE
JUDGE IN THE CASE.
>> I DON’T SEE HOW ANYBODY CAN
SAY THAT THIS JUDGE IS NOT
BIASED AND NOT LEANING IN A
CERTAIN DIRECTION.
>> HE IS SHIELDING KYLE AS IF HE
HAS A CHILD.
>> THIS JUDGE THROUGHOUT WHAT
MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE WOULD BE THE
ONE CHARGE THAT HE WOULD BE
CONVICTED OF.
>> HIS PHONE WAS GOING OFF WITH
A PHONE.
BUT WE WON’T GO INTO THAT TOO
DEEPLY.
>> WHAT ABOUT THE JUDGE
INVOLVING RITTENHOUSE AND
DRAWING THOSE NUMBERS?
I’VE NEVER SEEN THAT.
DOESN’T HAPPEN?
>> I’VE NEVER EVER SEEN THAT
BEFORE.
SPEAK WITH THE JUDGE RICK
SCHROEDER IS NOT CALLING FOR BUT
HE WILL THINK TWICE ABOUT LIVE
BROADCASTING ONE OF HIS TRIALS.
>> WHEN I TALK ABOUT PROBLEMS
WITH THE MEDIA WHEN THIS TRIAL
STARTED, WE WERE THERE IN PART.
WITHIN PART BECAUSE OF GROSSLY
IRRESPONSIBLE HANDLING OF WHAT
STILL COMES OUT OF THE TRIAL.
I WILL TELL YOU THIS, AND I WILL
THINK LONG AND HARD ABOUT LIVE
TELEVISION OF THE TRIAL NEXT
TIME.
>> GREG, HE’S RIGHT ABOUT THE
WAY THE MEDIA HAS COVERED THIS
BUT DON’T YOU THINK THE TRIAL
WAS BROADCAST SO THAT PEOPLE
COULD WATCH IT THEMSELVES
WITHOUT MEDIA FILTER?
>> Greg: THE MEDIA, IT IS
FUNNY PEOPLE ARE WATCHING IT AND
STILL MEDIA LYING ABOUT WHAT IS
HAPPENING, SELLERS ESPECIALLY,
JUST FULL OF FALSEHOOD.
WE ARE AT A STAGE EVERY JUROR
TAKES PART IN A TRIAL WILL HAVE
TO BE PLACED IN WITNESS
RELOCATION AFTER THE TRIAL
BECAUSE THE MEDIA AND AN
ACTIVIST CLASS TWIST THEM IN
DANGER BECAUSE THEY SEE VIOLENCE
AS AN APPROPRIATE RESPONSE IF
THE JURY DOESN’T COME BACK WITH
A DECISION THAT THEY WANT.
SO THE MEDIA PERPETUATES THE
CYCLE.
IF THERE IS RIOTS THEY WILL CALL
PEACEFUL BUT THEN PUTS THE COPS
ON NOTICE, YOU BETTER NOT ARM
THESE PEACEFUL PROTESTERS WITH
THE MOLOTOV COCKTAILS.
THEY WILL DELIBERATELY LIKE
THOSE CLOWNS IGNORE THE FACTS OF
THE CASE, BEAR THE TRUTH ABOUT
JACOB BLAKE AND THE TRUTH ABOUT
THE MAN THAT RITTENHOUSE THAT
RITTENHOUSE KILLED IN ORDER TO
MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS, THERE
IS TROUBLE LATER.
I’M NOT ROOTING FOR ANYTHING BUT
JUSTICE.
SO I WILL LIVE WITH WHATEVER
OUTCOME THERE IS.
BUT THE MEDIA PLAYS HAS A LOWER
BAR FOR THE ACTIVIST CLASS.
THEY BELIEVE THEY ARE HATE
ENDEMIC BEHAVIOR CAN INCLUDE ANY
KIND OF VIOLENCE NO MATTER WHAT.
I SAID YESTERDAY TO THE AUDIBLE
GASPS A MONTH AGO WHEN I TALKED
ABOUT THE DEREK CHAUVIN VERDICT
THAT I WAS RELIEVED THAT DEREK
CHAUVIN FOUND GUILTY BECAUSE THE
NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD NOT BE
TORCHED.
THERE WAS A COMMENTARY AND THE
JUSTICE BEING HELD OFF BENCH BY
THREATS OF MAYHEM BECAUSE THE
MEDIA WILL ALLOW THE ACTIVIST TO
WRITE FOR THAT REASON.
>> Katie: THEY HAVE RECEIVED A
NUMBER OF THREATS BECAUSE OF THE
TRIAL.
>>’S BEFORE THAT MIGHT BE A SIGN
OF THE TIME THE SPIRIT WE WERE
TALKING ABOUT PASSIONS BUT THEN
ALSO SOUND LIKE THREATS AND THEN
FBI IS INVOLVED.
THE JUDGE, I UNDERSTAND WHY THEY
DON’T WANT CAMERAS IN THE
COURTROOM BECAUSE SOME WAYS IT
IS A DISTRACTION AND CAN PUT THE
JURY IN JEOPARDY WE MAKE THEN
PERHAPS CHANGE THEIR MINDS, BUT
I ALSO THINK THAT THIS TRIAL
BEING ON TELEVISION HELPED A LOT
OF PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS
ACTUALLY HAPPENING THAT NIGHT.
WHY DID KYLE RITTENHOUSE FEEL
THREATENED?
WAS IT SELF-DEFENSE?
AND JUST THINK, WHAT IF IT
WASN’T ON TELEVISION WHERE THE
PROSECUTION WITNESSED AND ADMITS
HE HAD A GUN POINTED AT KYLE
RITTENHOUSE.
WITHOUT THAT WE WOULD NOT HAVE
KNOWN.
I’M VERY INTERESTED IN THE WHOLE
PROCESS OF THERE IS A MISTRIAL
MOTION AND WHEN THE JUDGE CAN
MAKE A DECISION AND THAT ALSO
INCLUDES EVEN IF THEY FIND HIM
GUILTY.
YOU CAN GO BACK AND SAY MISTRIAL
AND PROSECUTION HAS TO START ALL
OVER.
WE DON’T KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN
BUT WATCH THAT CLOSELY.
>> Katie: GERALDO CAN YOU
COMMENT ON THAT LEGAL EXPERTISE
WHILE THE TRIAL MOTION WAS
FILED?
AGAIN ONE FILE PREVIOUSLY IN THE
TRIAL BECAUSE THE PROSECUTION IS
HELD HIGH QUALITY VIDEO.
THE JURY HAD SEEN IT BEFORE BUT
LOW-QUALITY AND YOUR SUBMIT A
HIGH-QUALITY VERSION OF IT.
>> Geraldo: I THINK WHAT THE
DEFENSES INDICATING IS THAT THEY
WOULD HAVE PROCEEDED IN A
DIFFERENT WAY HAD THEY HAD THAT
VIVID, HIGH QUALITY VIDEO KNEW
MORE PRECISELY WHAT THEIR CLIENT
DID.
I THINK A COUPLE OF THINGS.
I THINK ON THE BASIS OF DEFENSE
MOVING FOR MISTRIAL WITHOUT
PRESENCE, WHICH MEANS THE STATE
WOULD HAVE A DO-OVER, THAT
DOESN’T SEEM THEY HAVE A LOT OF
CONFIDENCE IN THEIR CASE FOR THE
DEFENSE TO DID THAT.
WHY WOULD THEY WANT A MISTRIAL
WITHOUT A DO-OVER IF THEY
THOUGHT THEY WERE WINNING RIGHT
NOW?
SO, YOU KNOW WHOM I’M STARTING
TO FEEL A LITTLE BAD ON THE FACT
THAT DELIBERATIONS ARE NOW BEING
PROLONGED.
BUT REMEMBER WHEN I WAS STARTING
IN THE NEWS BUSINESS DECADES
AGO, A GUIDE, A SPORTS GUY LET’S
GO TO THE VIDEOTAPE.
NOWADAYS, BECAUSE OF BODY CAMS
ON COPS AND SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS
EVERYWHERE AND DRONES AND
CAMERAS, THE JURORS ARE
DISCOUNTING THE PHYSICAL
TESTIMONY AND ARE ASKING TO BE
THEIR OWN WITNESSES ARE LOOKING
AT THE VIDEOTAPES THEMSELVES AND
MAKING A DETERMINATION WHAT THEY
SEE, DID RITTENHOUSE PROVOKE THE
FIRST VICTIM ROSENBAUM OR WAS HE
MERELY TRYING TO DEFEND HIMSELF?
IF YOU SEE IN THE VIDEOTAPE, IF,
INDEED RITTENHOUSE IS POINTING
THE GUN FIRST AND THEN THE WHOLE
THING HAPPENS COMMIT IS
DIFFERENT IF ROSENBAUM IN HIS
FACE.
>> Dana: JESSE, THE
PROSECUTION BERATED BY THE JUDGE
MULTIPLE TIMES IN THE
TRIAL TRYING TO INTRODUCE
EVIDENCE THAT HAD BEEN THROWN
OUT AND NOW WE ARE LEARNING THEY
DIDN’T ACTUALLY GIVE THE DEFENSE
THE PROPER EVIDENCE.
>> Jesse: I AM SO SHOCKED HOW
UNETHICAL LAWYERS CAN BE.
THESE GUYS, YOU KNOW --
DOCTORING EVIDENCE AGAINST
DONALD TRUMP.
THEY ARE EMBEZZLING MONEY AND
SHAKING DOWN PEOPLE LIKE OFTEN
NAUGHTY.
AND REMEMBER MUELLER, DESTROYED
AFTER THAT WITCH HUNT.
I LOVE THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE
SUPPOSED TO BE INDEPENDENT
ACTORS BUT THEY ARE JUST LIKE
THE REST OF US COME A BUNCH OF
REALLY DIRTY ROTTEN SCOUNDRELS.
THESE ARE ROGUE PROSECUTORS.
THEY ARE ROGUE RUNAWAY
PROSECUTORS.
THIS IS GREAT BECAUSE NOW WE CAN
SEE HOW DASTARDLY THEY ARE.
IF YOU DIDN’T HAVE CAMERAS, YOU
GET THE PRESS COME OUT AND LIE
WHAT WOULD HAPPEN.
RIGHT NOW COME IF THEY DIDN’T
HAVE A WINDOW HERE, THE PRESS
WOULD SAY IT’S RAINING.
THEY OPEN UP THE WINDOW, NO
RAIN.
THE PRESS TELLS ME IT IS
RAINING.
THAT IS AT THE COUNTRY DOESN’T
TRUST THE PRESS ANYMORE.
YOU CAN SEE THE INTERNET NOW,
FULL VISIBILITY CAMERAS IN THE
COURTROOM AND YOU CAN SEE THE
ACTUAL DOCUMENTS.
THE FBI IG REPORTS.
YOU SEE A GREAT, GREAT TIME TO
BE A LIFE IN THE COUNTRY.
WE ARE JUST BEING LIED TO
INTERFACES.
AND THE PRESS IS ALSO TRASHING
THIS JUDGE.
THEY DON’T LIKE THIS JUDGE
BECAUSE HE SUPPOSED BE
IMPARTIAL.
THE LEFT HATES IMPARTIALITY.
THEY WANT ACTIVE ROADS AND THEY
POINT TO THE HIGH COURT AND A
TOTAL LEFT-WINGER.
BUT THE LIBERAL JUSTICE NEVER
CROSSES OVER TO THE SIDE WITH A
CONSERVATIVE.
IT’S ALWAYS THE CAN SERVICE
JUSTICE CROSSING OVER BECAUSE
THEY HAVE SEMBLANCE OF
INDEPENDENCE.
NO, NO, NO, THEY DON’T LIKE THE
SKY EVEN THOUGH THIS JUDGE
APPOINTED BY A DEMOCRAT AND RAN
FOR ELECTION LIKE A BUNCH OF
TIMES THE PEOPLE PUTTING THEM
THERE.
>> Katie:>> Katie: AND ASSOCIATE