>> Bill: STILL IN THE GAME.
>> Dana: LOOK HOW MUCH SHE
KNOWS ABOUT THAT STORY.
THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY CONSIDERING SENDING
MIGRANTS TO THE SOUTHERN BORDER
TO CITIES DEEPER IN THE UNITED
STATES.
NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE YET.
THIS AS A MASSIVE MIGRANT
CARAVAN IN MEXICO HEADS FOR THE
SOUTHERN BORDER.
ARKANSAS SENATOR TOM COTTON
JOINS US NOW.
THE SPOKESPERSON TELLING FOX
NEWS NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE
AND SHOULD ONE BE MADE, DHS
WILL COORDINATE WITH AND
SUPPORT CITIES AND NGOs TO
FACILITATE THE MOVEMENT OF ANY
INDIVIDUAL ENCOUNTERED AT THE
SOUTHWEST BORDER PLACED INTO
REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS THE NEXT
STEPS IN THEIR IMMIGRATION
PROCEEDINGS.
DO YOU BUY THAT?
>> NOT AT ALL.
THE REASON WHY WE HAVE THE
MIGRANT CARAVANS AND SO MANY
MIGRANTS AT THE BORDER IS JOE
BIDEN INVITED THEM TO COME FOR
THE LAST TWO YEARS.
THERE IS NO SPACE LEFT AT MANY
OF THESE FACILITIES AT THE
BORDER BECAUSE THERE ARE SUCH
OVERWHELMING NUMBERS AND
TALKING ABOUT RELOCATING MY
GRANTS TO THE OTHER PARTS OF
THE COUNTRY AWAY FROM THE
BORDER.
I AGREE THEY SHOULD BE
RELOCATED.
RELOCATED BACK TO THEIR HOME
COUNTRIES BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO
RIGHT TO ENTER AMERICA.
BUT JOE BIDEN APPARENTLY THINKS
THAT THERE ARE HIGH LEVELS OF
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION THAT WE
SHOULD TOLERATE.
THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF
ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION IS ZERO.
>> Bill: SO FAR YOU WON’T GET
YOUR WAY.
IN APRIL TITLE 42 STILL IN
PLACE.
YOU COME HERE, THE PANDEMIC,
YOU ARE RETURNED BACK TO YOUR
HOME COUNTRY.
IN THE MONTH OF APRIL THERE
WERE 234,000 ENCOUNTERS BY
BORDER PATROL AND YOU HAD 50%
OF THOSE RETURNED BY WAY OF
TITLE 42.
THE POINT BEING THEY AREN’T
ENFORCING THE LAWS THAT ARE
THERE ALREADY, SIR.
>> BILL, THE POINT ABOUT TITLE
42 IS A GOOD ONE.
ALTHOUGH IT WAS LATER ENFORCED
UPON THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION
BY A COURT, THE SIMPLE FACT
THAT JOE BIDEN’S ADMINISTRATION
ANNOUNCED THEY WERE NO LONGER
GOING TO APPLY THAT PUBLIC
HEALTH EXCLUSION ORDER SENT A
STRONG SIGNAL ACROSS THE WORLD
THAT NOW WAS THE TIME TO COME.
IF YOU HAD BEEN TURNED BACK
PREVIOUSLY BECAUSE OF
CORONAVIRUS OR HEARD THAT WAS
THE CASE NOW YOU COULD GET HERE.
IT DIDN’T MATTER ALL THAT MUCH
THAT A COURT ENJOINED THE BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION FROM ENDING THAT
PUBLIC HEALTH EXCLUSION ORDER
BECAUSE THE WRONG SIGNALS
ALREADY HAD BEEN SENT AND HE
HAS BEEN SENDING THEM SINCE HIS
CAMPAIGN.
>> Dana: I WANT TO SWITCH GEARS
TO THE ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION
FROM THE SUSPECT ARRESTED
OUTSIDE KAVANAUGH’S HOME.
AFTER THAT ARREST THERE WERE
ADDITIONAL PROTESTS FROM RUTH
SENT US, A GROUP THAT IS TO ME
LIKE THE WESTBORO BAPTIST
CHURCH.
AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THERE IS A
FEDERAL LAW THAT SAYS YOU
CANNOT PROTEST IN FRONT OF A
FEDERAL JUDGE’S HOME.
LAST NIGHT JUST AFTER THEY HAD
ARRESTED A GUY WHO HAD ALL
THESE WEAPONS THEY HAD THE
PROTESTORS OUT THERE BUT NO ONE
IS ARRESTED.
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THAT?
WHY NOT SHOW SOME DETERRENCE IN
THE FACE OF ALL OF IT?
>> THIS IS THE SHOCK AND
CULMINATION OF THE DEMOCRATIC
LEFT’S WAR AGAINST THE SECURITY
AND AGAINST OUR CONSTITUTION IN
AMERICA.
CHUCK SCHUMER A COUPLE OF YEARS
AGO WENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
STEPS AND BY NAME ATTACKED
BRETT KAVANAUGH AND SAID HE
WOULD PAY THE PRICE.
HE WOULDN’T KNOW WHAT HIT HIM.
YESTERDAY A DEMOCRATIC HIT MAN
SHOWED UP AT BRETT KAVANAUGH’S
HOUSE TO TRY TO MURDER HIM AND
PRESUMABLY HIS WIFE AND
CHILDREN.
THAT VERY SAME NIGHT JUST HOURS
AFTER DEMOCRATIC HIT MAN TRIED
TO KILL BRETT KAVANAUGH YOU HAD
LEFT WING STREET MILITIA’S
ANNOUNCING ON THE INTERNET IN
ADVANCE THEY WOULD VIOLATE
FEDERAL LAW BY PROTESTING IN
FRONT OF A JUSTICE’S HOME.
AS YOU SAY THERE IS AN EXPLICIT
FEDERAL LAW AGAINST PROTESTING
IN FRONT OF THE HOMES OF JUDGES
OR JURORS.
YET AGAIN, THE HAPLESS ATTORNEY
GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND DID
NOTHING.
HE SHOULD RESIGN IN DISGRACE.
IF HE WON’T WE SHOULD START
IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST
HIM IN JANUARY WHEN WE’RE IN
CONTROL OF THE CONGRESS BECAUSE
THE RULE OF LAW IN THIS COUNTRY
MUST BE ENFORCED EVENLY
IRRESPECTIVE OF ONE’S POLITICAL
PARTIES AND VIEWS.
>> Bill: THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME.
TOM COTTON.
WHETHER IT’S THE BORDER,
WASHINGTON, D.C. OR THE SUBURBS