ANYMORE. IT‘S ALL THERE. SO, THE QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK
IT‘S ALL THERE. SO, THE QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK ONCE AGAIN AS THE REVELATIONS
SO, THE QUESTION I HAVE TO ASK ONCE AGAIN AS THE REVELATIONS CONTINUE, THE ALLEGED ABUSES
ONCE AGAIN AS THE REVELATIONS CONTINUE, THE ALLEGED ABUSES OF POWER
CONTINUE, THE ALLEGED ABUSES OF POWER PILE UP AND DEMOCRACY
OF POWER PILE UP AND DEMOCRACY CONTINUES TO HANG IN THE
PILE UP AND DEMOCRACY CONTINUES TO HANG IN THE BALANCE
CONTINUES TO HANG IN THE BALANCE IS WHERE IS THE JUSTICE?
BALANCE IS WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? JUSTICE
IS WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? JUSTICE DEPARTMENT?
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT? WHERE, OH, WHERE IS MERRICK
DEPARTMENT? WHERE, OH, WHERE IS MERRICK GARLAND AS PROMISED? LET‘S
WHERE, OH, WHERE IS MERRICK GARLAND AS PROMISED? LET‘S BRING IN A FORMER ASSISTANT
GARLAND AS PROMISED? LET‘S BRING IN A FORMER ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, FROM THE WATERGATE
BRING IN A FORMER ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, FROM THE WATERGATE INVESTIGATION,
PROSECUTOR, FROM THE WATERGATE INVESTIGATION, JILL WINE BANK FORMALLY, JILL
INVESTIGATION, JILL WINE BANK FORMALLY, JILL VULNER. SHE‘S CO-HOST OF THE
JILL WINE BANK FORMALLY, JILL VULNER. SHE‘S CO-HOST OF THE HASHTAG SISTERS-IN-LAW PODCAST
VULNER. SHE‘S CO-HOST OF THE HASHTAG SISTERS-IN-LAW PODCAST AND AN MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR,
HASHTAG SISTERS-IN-LAW PODCAST AND AN MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR, WE ALSO HAVE
AND AN MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR, WE ALSO HAVE UMPH BIOGRAPHER, TIM O‘BRIEN
WE ALSO HAVE UMPH BIOGRAPHER, TIM O‘BRIEN WITH US. HE‘S AN MSNBC,
UMPH BIOGRAPHER, TIM O‘BRIEN WITH US. HE‘S AN MSNBC, POLITICAL ANALYST AND SENIOR
WITH US. HE‘S AN MSNBC, POLITICAL ANALYST AND SENIOR COLUMNIST FOR BLOOMBERG
POLITICAL ANALYST AND SENIOR COLUMNIST FOR BLOOMBERG OPINION. HIS
COLUMNIST FOR BLOOMBERG OPINION. HIS PIECE THIS MORNING IS TITLED
OPINION. HIS PIECE THIS MORNING IS TITLED MERRICK GARLAND HAS MORE THAN
PIECE THIS MORNING IS TITLED MERRICK GARLAND HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO INVESTIGATE
MERRICK GARLAND HAS MORE THAN ENOUGH TO INVESTIGATE TRUMP.
ENOUGH TO INVESTIGATE TRUMP. JOE. LET ME START WITH YOU.
TRUMP. JOE. LET ME START WITH YOU. THANK YOU BOTH FOR JOINING US.
JOE. LET ME START WITH YOU. THANK YOU BOTH FOR JOINING US. I KNOW THESE KINDS OF
THANK YOU BOTH FOR JOINING US. I KNOW THESE KINDS OF INVESTIGATIONS DON‘T TAKE
I KNOW THESE KINDS OF INVESTIGATIONS DON‘T TAKE PLACE IN A VACUUM, BUT JILL,
INVESTIGATIONS DON‘T TAKE PLACE IN A VACUUM, BUT JILL, IF YOU‘RE LOOKING SOLELY AT
PLACE IN A VACUUM, BUT JILL, IF YOU‘RE LOOKING SOLELY AT THE EVIDENCE
IF YOU‘RE LOOKING SOLELY AT THE EVIDENCE SIDE BY SIDE,
THE EVIDENCE SIDE BY SIDE, HOW DOES THE TYPE AND
SIDE BY SIDE, HOW DOES THE TYPE AND VOLUME OF EVIDENCE AGAINST
HOW DOES THE TYPE AND VOLUME OF EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP?
VOLUME OF EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP? STACK UP AGAINST THE EVIDENCE?
TRUMP? STACK UP AGAINST THE EVIDENCE? NIXON?
STACK UP AGAINST THE EVIDENCE? NIXON? THE PUBLIC EVIDENCE
NIXON? THE PUBLIC EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP IS
THE PUBLIC EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP IS OVERWHELMING.
AGAINST TRUMP IS OVERWHELMING. I CAN NO LONGER
OVERWHELMING. I CAN NO LONGER GIVE ANY
I CAN NO LONGER GIVE ANY EXPLANATION FOR THE SILENCE
GIVE ANY EXPLANATION FOR THE SILENCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
EXPLANATION FOR THE SILENCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OR FROM
FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OR FROM THE
OR FROM THE BAT MATTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
THE BAT MATTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRAG OR ANY OF THE OTHER
BAT MATTER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRAG OR ANY OF THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONGOING
BRAG OR ANY OF THE OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONGOING INVESTIGATION.
PEOPLE WHO HAVE ONGOING INVESTIGATION. IT IS TIME FOR ACTION.
INVESTIGATION. IT IS TIME FOR ACTION. THE EVIDENCE IS
IT IS TIME FOR ACTION. THE EVIDENCE IS VOLUMINOUS
THE EVIDENCE IS VOLUMINOUS AND WE SEE IT IN PLAIN
VOLUMINOUS AND WE SEE IT IN PLAIN SIGHT. SO ANYONE WHO‘S
AND WE SEE IT IN PLAIN SIGHT. SO ANYONE WHO‘S WATCHING THE NEWS KNOWS
SIGHT. SO ANYONE WHO‘S WATCHING THE NEWS KNOWS THAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN
WATCHING THE NEWS KNOWS THAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED.
THAT CRIMES HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. AND THEY SHOULD BE ACTED UPON.
COMMITTED. AND THEY SHOULD BE ACTED UPON. TIM, AS I MENTIONED, IN MY
AND THEY SHOULD BE ACTED UPON. TIM, AS I MENTIONED, IN MY INTRO, THERE YOU
TIM, AS I MENTIONED, IN MY INTRO, THERE YOU QUESTION IN YOUR NEW OPINION,
INTRO, THERE YOU QUESTION IN YOUR NEW OPINION, COLUMN Y MERRICK. GARLAND
QUESTION IN YOUR NEW OPINION, COLUMN Y MERRICK. GARLAND SEEMS SEEMS SO INACTIVE WHEN
COLUMN Y MERRICK. GARLAND SEEMS SEEMS SO INACTIVE WHEN IT COMES TO TRUMP QUOTE. HE
SEEMS SEEMS SO INACTIVE WHEN IT COMES TO TRUMP QUOTE. HE HAS. EVERY REASON TO BE
IT COMES TO TRUMP QUOTE. HE HAS. EVERY REASON TO BE CIRCUMSPECT YOU, RIGHT? OF
HAS. EVERY REASON TO BE CIRCUMSPECT YOU, RIGHT? OF COURSE, BUT HE HAS NO REASON
CIRCUMSPECT YOU, RIGHT? OF COURSE, BUT HE HAS NO REASON TO IGNORE THE MOUNTING
COURSE, BUT HE HAS NO REASON TO IGNORE THE MOUNTING EVIDENCE OF TRUMPS
TO IGNORE THE MOUNTING EVIDENCE OF TRUMPS CRIMES.
EVIDENCE OF TRUMPS CRIMES. GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS TRUMP.
CRIMES. GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS TRUMP. TIM.
GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS TRUMP. TIM. I‘M A GUY CALLED YOU TRUMP.
TIM. I‘M A GUY CALLED YOU TRUMP. I‘M GOING TO BEGIN WITH A HUGE
I‘M A GUY CALLED YOU TRUMP. I‘M GOING TO BEGIN WITH A HUGE APOLOGY THERE. THAT‘S A
I‘M GOING TO BEGIN WITH A HUGE APOLOGY THERE. THAT‘S A HORRIBLE THING TO SAY TO YOU,
APOLOGY THERE. THAT‘S A HORRIBLE THING TO SAY TO YOU, GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS. TIM,
HORRIBLE THING TO SAY TO YOU, GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS. TIM, TIM
GARLAND‘S DEFENDERS. TIM, TIM WOULD SAY HE‘S NOT
TIM WOULD SAY HE‘S NOT NECESSARILY IGNORE.
WOULD SAY HE‘S NOT NECESSARILY IGNORE. EVIDENCE. HE‘S JUST NOT
NECESSARILY IGNORE. EVIDENCE. HE‘S JUST NOT COMMENTING ON THE STATE OF THE
EVIDENCE. HE‘S JUST NOT COMMENTING ON THE STATE OF THE INVESTIGATION. PERSONALLY. I
COMMENTING ON THE STATE OF THE INVESTIGATION. PERSONALLY. I DON‘T BUY THAT. DO.
INVESTIGATION. PERSONALLY. I DON‘T BUY THAT. DO. IT JUST THERE‘S NO OUTWARD
DON‘T BUY THAT. DO. IT JUST THERE‘S NO OUTWARD APPEARANCES AT ALL THAT THEY
IT JUST THERE‘S NO OUTWARD APPEARANCES AT ALL THAT THEY HAVE AN AGGRESSIVE
APPEARANCES AT ALL THAT THEY HAVE AN AGGRESSIVE INVESTIGATION THAT WILL LEAD
HAVE AN AGGRESSIVE INVESTIGATION THAT WILL LEAD TO A
INVESTIGATION THAT WILL LEAD TO A PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTION UNDER
TO A PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTION UNDER WAY.
PROFESSIONAL PROSECUTION UNDER WAY. PERHAPS HE DOES
WAY. PERHAPS HE DOES BUT IT IS JUST NOT.
PERHAPS HE DOES BUT IT IS JUST NOT. RESONATING LIKE THAT AND
BUT IT IS JUST NOT. RESONATING LIKE THAT AND WHEN YOU KNOW THE THIS WHOLE
RESONATING LIKE THAT AND WHEN YOU KNOW THE THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF THE FACT PATTERN AND
WHEN YOU KNOW THE THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF THE FACT PATTERN AND THE EVIDENT THAT THIS POINT IS
ISSUE OF THE FACT PATTERN AND THE EVIDENT THAT THIS POINT IS MORE THAN
THE EVIDENT THAT THIS POINT IS MORE THAN OVERWHELMING, HE HAS
MORE THAN OVERWHELMING, HE HAS EVERYTHING HE NEEDS.
OVERWHELMING, HE HAS EVERYTHING HE NEEDS. I THINK
EVERYTHING HE NEEDS. I THINK TO INDEPENDENTLY, GET TO WORK
I THINK TO INDEPENDENTLY, GET TO WORK HERE. AND SO THE QUESTION
TO INDEPENDENTLY, GET TO WORK HERE. AND SO THE QUESTION IS,
HERE. AND SO THE QUESTION IS, WHEN YOU LOOK BACK
IS, WHEN YOU LOOK BACK AT,
WHEN YOU LOOK BACK AT, YOU KNOW, RICHARD NIXON‘S
AT, YOU KNOW, RICHARD NIXON‘S CRIMES, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE
YOU KNOW, RICHARD NIXON‘S CRIMES, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THIS INNOCENT ERA AND OF
CRIMES, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THIS INNOCENT ERA AND OF COURSE, RICHARD NIXON, AND HIS
THIS INNOCENT ERA AND OF COURSE, RICHARD NIXON, AND HIS TEAM WERE ANYTHING, BUT
COURSE, RICHARD NIXON, AND HIS TEAM WERE ANYTHING, BUT INNOCENT,
TEAM WERE ANYTHING, BUT INNOCENT, BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY BURGLED
INNOCENT, BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY BURGLED LARRY
BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY BURGLED LARRY O‘BRIEN‘S,
LARRY O‘BRIEN‘S, BNC OPPOSITE, THE WATERGATE,
O‘BRIEN‘S, BNC OPPOSITE, THE WATERGATE, YOU KNOW, USING,
BNC OPPOSITE, THE WATERGATE, YOU KNOW, USING, YOU KNOW, ALYSSA SLUSH FUND.
YOU KNOW, USING, YOU KNOW, ALYSSA SLUSH FUND. DONALD TRUMP
YOU KNOW, ALYSSA SLUSH FUND. DONALD TRUMP TRIED TO STAGE A COUP.
DONALD TRUMP TRIED TO STAGE A COUP. AND
TRIED TO STAGE A COUP. AND UNDERMINE DEMOCRACY
AND UNDERMINE DEMOCRACY OF MAGNITUDE.
UNDERMINE DEMOCRACY OF MAGNITUDE. IT IS FAR MORE AGGRESSIVE.
OF MAGNITUDE. IT IS FAR MORE AGGRESSIVE. I THINK THERE IS NO QUESTION
IT IS FAR MORE AGGRESSIVE. I THINK THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT HE WAS ENGAGED IN THAT
I THINK THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT HE WAS ENGAGED IN THAT ACTIVITY.
THAT HE WAS ENGAGED IN THAT ACTIVITY. THE ONLY THING THAT‘S
ACTIVITY. THE ONLY THING THAT‘S OUTSTANDING IS FILLING IN THE
THE ONLY THING THAT‘S OUTSTANDING IS FILLING IN THE BLANKS ABOUT THE EXTENT TO
OUTSTANDING IS FILLING IN THE BLANKS ABOUT THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE ORCHESTRATED IT.
BLANKS ABOUT THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE ORCHESTRATED IT. THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE PULLED
WHICH HE ORCHESTRATED IT. THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE PULLED OTHER PEOPLE, INTO THAT LOOP.
THE EXTENT TO WHICH HE PULLED OTHER PEOPLE, INTO THAT LOOP. HE WAS AT A MINIMUM
OTHER PEOPLE, INTO THAT LOOP. HE WAS AT A MINIMUM AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT.
HE WAS AT A MINIMUM AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. WE HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO
AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT. WE HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO KNOW THAT,
WE HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO KNOW THAT, AND I THINK
KNOW THAT, AND I THINK THERE‘S ENOUGH INFORMATION TO
AND I THINK THERE‘S ENOUGH INFORMATION TO INVESTIGATE
THERE‘S ENOUGH INFORMATION TO INVESTIGATE UPON
INVESTIGATE UPON IF YOU WANT TO PROSECUTE HIM,
UPON IF YOU WANT TO PROSECUTE HIM, FOR BEING THE PRIMARY
IF YOU WANT TO PROSECUTE HIM, FOR BEING THE PRIMARY ARCHITECT
FOR BEING THE PRIMARY ARCHITECT OF A COUP.
ARCHITECT OF A COUP. YOU CAN FILL IN THE BLANKS AS
OF A COUP. YOU CAN FILL IN THE BLANKS AS YOU GO, BUT THE,
YOU CAN FILL IN THE BLANKS AS YOU GO, BUT THE, I DON‘T THINK THERE‘S ANY
YOU GO, BUT THE, I DON‘T THINK THERE‘S ANY REASON TO THE WEIGHT AND IF
I DON‘T THINK THERE‘S ANY REASON TO THE WEIGHT AND IF OUR OWN LAW ENFORCEMENT
REASON TO THE WEIGHT AND IF OUR OWN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS,
OUR OWN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, LACK THE STEEL
OFFICIALS, LACK THE STEEL TO DO WHAT THEIR JOBS
LACK THE STEEL TO DO WHAT THEIR JOBS REQUIRE THEM TO DO. WE‘RE
TO DO WHAT THEIR JOBS REQUIRE THEM TO DO. WE‘RE GOING TO BE IN A VERY DARK
REQUIRE THEM TO DO. WE‘RE GOING TO BE IN A VERY DARK PLACE,
GOING TO BE IN A VERY DARK PLACE, I THINK.
PLACE, I THINK. YES, INDEED, AND I THINK
I THINK. YES, INDEED, AND I THINK YOU MENTIONED NIXON AND TRUMP.
YES, INDEED, AND I THINK YOU MENTIONED NIXON AND TRUMP. I MEAN THE FUNDAMENTAL
YOU MENTIONED NIXON AND TRUMP. I MEAN THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE IS NIXON FOR ALL
I MEAN THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE IS NIXON FOR ALL HIS MANY SINS, FLAWS AND
DIFFERENCE IS NIXON FOR ALL HIS MANY SINS, FLAWS AND CRIMES
HIS MANY SINS, FLAWS AND CRIMES SEEM TO HAVE SOME SHAME. I
CRIMES SEEM TO HAVE SOME SHAME. I MEAN HE RESIGNED TO AVOID.
SEEM TO HAVE SOME SHAME. I MEAN HE RESIGNED TO AVOID. AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL ON THE
MEAN HE RESIGNED TO AVOID. AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL ON THE ADVICE OF HIS OWN PARTY.
AN IMPEACHMENT TRIAL ON THE ADVICE OF HIS OWN PARTY. WHERE‘S DONALD? TRUMP WAS
ADVICE OF HIS OWN PARTY. WHERE‘S DONALD? TRUMP WAS TWICE IMPEACHED, AND STILL
WHERE‘S DONALD? TRUMP WAS TWICE IMPEACHED, AND STILL WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT AGAIN,
TWICE IMPEACHED, AND STILL WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT AGAIN, JOE. LET ME ASK YOU THIS
WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT AGAIN, JOE. LET ME ASK YOU THIS AGAIN, COMING BACK TO THE
JOE. LET ME ASK YOU THIS AGAIN, COMING BACK TO THE GARLAND ISSUE. YOU‘RE A FORMER
AGAIN, COMING BACK TO THE GARLAND ISSUE. YOU‘RE A FORMER PROSECUTOR.
GARLAND ISSUE. YOU‘RE A FORMER PROSECUTOR. A LOT OF PROSECUTORS ARE
PROSECUTOR. A LOT OF PROSECUTORS ARE DEFENDING. GARLAND ARE
A LOT OF PROSECUTORS ARE DEFENDING. GARLAND ARE DEFENDING BRAG. ALVIN BRAG THE
DEFENDING. GARLAND ARE DEFENDING BRAG. ALVIN BRAG THE DA IN MANHATTAN WHO SEEMS TO
DEFENDING BRAG. ALVIN BRAG THE DA IN MANHATTAN WHO SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN PULLING BACK
THE GROUNDS THAT LOOK BRAD,
THE GROUNDS THAT LOOK BRAD, CAN‘T COMMENT PUBLICLY
THE GROUNDS THAT LOOK BRAD, CAN‘T COMMENT PUBLICLY GARLAND COMP COMMENT PUBLICLY,
CAN‘T COMMENT PUBLICLY GARLAND COMP COMMENT PUBLICLY, MY PROBLEM WITH THAT ARGUMENT
GARLAND COMP COMMENT PUBLICLY, MY PROBLEM WITH THAT ARGUMENT AND TIM JUST MENTIONED, YOU
MY PROBLEM WITH THAT ARGUMENT AND TIM JUST MENTIONED, YOU KNOW. TRUMP TRIED TO STAGE A
AND TIM JUST MENTIONED, YOU KNOW. TRUMP TRIED TO STAGE A COUP. IT‘S A ROLLING
KNOW. TRUMP TRIED TO STAGE A COUP. IT‘S A ROLLING COUP. HE STILL TRYING TO
COUP. IT‘S A ROLLING COUP. HE STILL TRYING TO STAGED A COUP.
COUP. HE STILL TRYING TO STAGED A COUP. IT‘S ONGOING AND THEREFORE
STAGED A COUP. IT‘S ONGOING AND THEREFORE WHATEVER
IT‘S ONGOING AND THEREFORE WHATEVER NORMS WE HAVE OUR IN AG CAN‘T
WHATEVER NORMS WE HAVE OUR IN AG CAN‘T COMMENT ON A CASE THAT GOES
NORMS WE HAVE OUR IN AG CAN‘T COMMENT ON A CASE THAT GOES OUT THE WINDOW. THE GUY IS
COMMENT ON A CASE THAT GOES OUT THE WINDOW. THE GUY IS TRYING TO BE THE NEXT
OUT THE WINDOW. THE GUY IS TRYING TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT, SOME POINT. IT‘LL
TRYING TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT, SOME POINT. IT‘LL BE TOO CLOSE TO AN ELECTION TO
PRESIDENT, SOME POINT. IT‘LL BE TOO CLOSE TO AN ELECTION TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. SO,
BE TOO CLOSE TO AN ELECTION TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. SO, WHERE IS THAT SPEED? WHERE IS
DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. SO, WHERE IS THAT SPEED? WHERE IS THAT HAST? WHERE IS THAT
WHERE IS THAT SPEED? WHERE IS THAT HAST? WHERE IS THAT AGGRESSIVENESS AS TIM
THAT HAST? WHERE IS THAT AGGRESSIVENESS AS TIM PUT? IT?
AGGRESSIVENESS AS TIM PUT? IT? JILL, IN YOUR
PUT? IT? JILL, IN YOUR VIEW.
JILL, IN YOUR VIEW. SO, I
VIEW. SO, I DO WANT TO SAY YOU
SO, I DO WANT TO SAY YOU CANNOT PUBLICLY COMMENT. I‘M
DO WANT TO SAY YOU CANNOT PUBLICLY COMMENT. I‘M NOT
CANNOT PUBLICLY COMMENT. I‘M NOT OPPOSING
NOT OPPOSING MERRICK GARLAND OR
OPPOSING MERRICK GARLAND OR DEA BRAG FOR NOT
MERRICK GARLAND OR DEA BRAG FOR NOT PUBLICLY SAYING ANYTHING.
DEA BRAG FOR NOT PUBLICLY SAYING ANYTHING. I‘M SAYING THAT THE EVIDENCE
PUBLICLY SAYING ANYTHING. I‘M SAYING THAT THE EVIDENCE NOW IS MOUNTING THAT THEY ARE
I‘M SAYING THAT THE EVIDENCE NOW IS MOUNTING THAT THEY ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING
NOW IS MOUNTING THAT THEY ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS
NOT DOING ANYTHING AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY
AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY THAT A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY THAT A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION. WOULD NOT HAVE HAD
THAT A SERIOUS INVESTIGATION. WOULD NOT HAVE HAD SOME
WOULD NOT HAVE HAD SOME LEAKED THAT SOMEONE WHO WAS
SOME LEAKED THAT SOMEONE WHO WAS SUBPOENAED
LEAKED THAT SOMEONE WHO WAS SUBPOENAED WOULDN‘T HAVE SAID I‘M NOT
SUBPOENAED WOULDN‘T HAVE SAID I‘M NOT GOING. I‘M TAKING IT TO COURT.
WOULDN‘T HAVE SAID I‘M NOT GOING. I‘M TAKING IT TO COURT. THEY WOULDN‘T HAVE GONE PUBLIC
GOING. I‘M TAKING IT TO COURT. THEY WOULDN‘T HAVE GONE PUBLIC WITH IT. SO IT‘S GETTING
THEY WOULDN‘T HAVE GONE PUBLIC WITH IT. SO IT‘S GETTING HARDER AND HARDER TO BELIEVE
WITH IT. SO IT‘S GETTING HARDER AND HARDER TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING
HARDER AND HARDER TO BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING THIS.
THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING THIS. THEY ARE WAITING FOR. IT.
THIS. THEY ARE WAITING FOR. IT. LOOKS LIKE
THEY ARE WAITING FOR. IT. LOOKS LIKE CONGRESS TO MAKE A CRIMINAL
LOOKS LIKE CONGRESS TO MAKE A CRIMINAL REFERRAL,
CONGRESS TO MAKE A CRIMINAL REFERRAL, BUT THEY‘RE NOT EVEN ACTING ON
REFERRAL, BUT THEY‘RE NOT EVEN ACTING ON THE CRIMINAL REFERRALS SO FAR.
BUT THEY‘RE NOT EVEN ACTING ON THE CRIMINAL REFERRALS SO FAR. WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH
THE CRIMINAL REFERRALS SO FAR. WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH MARK MEADOWS? HE‘S BEEN
WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH MARK MEADOWS? HE‘S BEEN REFERRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
MARK MEADOWS? HE‘S BEEN REFERRED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONGRESS AND THEY HAVEN‘T DONE
REFERRED FOR CONSTRUCTION CONGRESS AND THEY HAVEN‘T DONE ANYTHING WITH THAT.
CONGRESS AND THEY HAVEN‘T DONE ANYTHING WITH THAT. SO IT GETS HARDER AND HARDER
ANYTHING WITH THAT. SO IT GETS HARDER AND HARDER TO BELIEVE
SO IT GETS HARDER AND HARDER TO BELIEVE THAT. THAT‘S RIGHT, YOU KNOW,
TO BELIEVE THAT. THAT‘S RIGHT, YOU KNOW, IN
THAT. THAT‘S RIGHT, YOU KNOW, IN WATERGATE.
IN WATERGATE. WE GAVE THE EVIDENCE. WE
WATERGATE. WE GAVE THE EVIDENCE. WE PUT TOGETHER
WE GAVE THE EVIDENCE. WE PUT TOGETHER TO CONGRESS AS A
PUT TOGETHER TO CONGRESS AS A ROADMAP FOR IMPEACHMENT. WE
TO CONGRESS AS A ROADMAP FOR IMPEACHMENT. WE DIDN‘T WAIT FOR CONGRESS
ROADMAP FOR IMPEACHMENT. WE DIDN‘T WAIT FOR CONGRESS TO DEVELOP THE EVIDENCE TO
DIDN‘T WAIT FOR CONGRESS TO DEVELOP THE EVIDENCE TO GIVE US TO PROSECUTE.
TO DEVELOP THE EVIDENCE TO GIVE US TO PROSECUTE. THE ROLE OF A PROSECUTOR IS
GIVE US TO PROSECUTE. THE ROLE OF A PROSECUTOR IS TO BUILD EVIDENCE OF A CRIME.
THE ROLE OF A PROSECUTOR IS TO BUILD EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. WHEN IT IS APPARENT THAT THERE
TO BUILD EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. WHEN IT IS APPARENT THAT THERE HAS BEEN AT LEAST
WHEN IT IS APPARENT THAT THERE HAS BEEN AT LEAST GROUNDS FOR
HAS BEEN AT LEAST GROUNDS FOR INVESTIGATING AND HERE, NO ONE
GROUNDS FOR INVESTIGATING AND HERE, NO ONE CAN DOUBT DOES SEEM TO BE
RELIANCE ON CONGRESS
RELIANCE ON CONGRESS SPECIFICALLY ON THE 16
RELIANCE ON CONGRESS SPECIFICALLY ON THE 16 COMMITTEE WHICH LAST NIGHT
SPECIFICALLY ON THE 16 COMMITTEE WHICH LAST NIGHT REFERRED TO MORE
COMMITTEE WHICH LAST NIGHT REFERRED TO MORE FORMER TRUMP AIDS. DANCE
REFERRED TO MORE FORMER TRUMP AIDS. DANCE COVINO AND PETER NAVARRO TO
FORMER TRUMP AIDS. DANCE COVINO AND PETER NAVARRO TO THE DOJ. BUT AS YOU POINT OUT
COVINO AND PETER NAVARRO TO THE DOJ. BUT AS YOU POINT OUT THE DOJ STILL HASN‘T DONE
THE DOJ. BUT AS YOU POINT OUT THE DOJ STILL HASN‘T DONE ANYTHING ABOUT MARK MEADOWS.
THE DOJ STILL HASN‘T DONE ANYTHING ABOUT MARK MEADOWS. SEVERAL MONTHS LATER
ANYTHING ABOUT MARK MEADOWS. SEVERAL MONTHS LATER INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH. THE 16
SEVERAL MONTHS LATER INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH. THE 16 COMMITTEE IS NOW LOOKING AT
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH. THE 16 COMMITTEE IS NOW LOOKING AT THE ISSUE OF CLARENCE AND
COMMITTEE IS NOW LOOKING AT THE ISSUE OF CLARENCE AND GINNY, THOMAS THE SUPREME
THE ISSUE OF CLARENCE AND GINNY, THOMAS THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, AND HIS WIFE
GINNY, THOMAS THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, AND HIS WIFE WHO WAS OF COURSE,
COURT JUSTICE, AND HIS WIFE WHO WAS OF COURSE, TEXTING THE TRUMP
WHO WAS OF COURSE, TEXTING THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE,
TEXTING THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE, TIM. I WANT TO HAVE YOU LISTEN
WHITE HOUSE, TIM. I WANT TO HAVE YOU LISTEN TO BENNIE THOMPSON
TIM. I WANT TO HAVE YOU LISTEN TO BENNIE THOMPSON TO CHAIR OF THE HOUSE 16
TO BENNIE THOMPSON TO CHAIR OF THE HOUSE 16 COMMITTEE
I THINK HE SHOULD BE INVITED
I THINK HE SHOULD BE INVITED GIVEN
I THINK HE SHOULD BE INVITED GIVEN THE INFORMATION THAT WE
GIVEN THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE AS A
THE INFORMATION THAT WE HAVE AS A COMMITTEE DEVELOPED OVER TIME.
HAVE AS A COMMITTEE DEVELOPED OVER TIME. INVITE PEOPLE.
SO YOU‘VE GOT BENNY THOMPSON,
SO YOU‘VE GOT BENNY THOMPSON, THEY‘RE SUGGESTING THAT GINNY
SO YOU‘VE GOT BENNY THOMPSON, THEY‘RE SUGGESTING THAT GINNY THOMAS WILL BE INVITED FOR AN
THEY‘RE SUGGESTING THAT GINNY THOMAS WILL BE INVITED FOR AN INTERVIEW IF NOT SUBPOENAED.
THOMAS WILL BE INVITED FOR AN INTERVIEW IF NOT SUBPOENAED. WHERE AGAIN
INTERVIEW IF NOT SUBPOENAED. WHERE AGAIN TO COME BACK TO JOHN‘S POINT
WHERE AGAIN TO COME BACK TO JOHN‘S POINT ABOUT WAITING FOR CONGRESS,
TO COME BACK TO JOHN‘S POINT ABOUT WAITING FOR CONGRESS, YOU KNOW, JOE BIDEN YESTERDAY,
ABOUT WAITING FOR CONGRESS, YOU KNOW, JOE BIDEN YESTERDAY, DODGED AN ANSWER
YOU KNOW, JOE BIDEN YESTERDAY, DODGED AN ANSWER ON WHAT HE THINKS SHOULD
DODGED AN ANSWER ON WHAT HE THINKS SHOULD HAPPEN TO CLARENCE. THOMAS
ON WHAT HE THINKS SHOULD HAPPEN TO CLARENCE. THOMAS NUMEROUS SENIOR
HAPPEN TO CLARENCE. THOMAS NUMEROUS SENIOR I‘LL TALKING VAGUELY
NUMEROUS SENIOR I‘LL TALKING VAGUELY AND MAYBE HE SHOULD RECUSE
I‘LL TALKING VAGUELY AND MAYBE HE SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF.
AND MAYBE HE SHOULD RECUSE HIMSELF. I MEAN HIS WIFE.
HIMSELF. I MEAN HIS WIFE. COULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE
I MEAN HIS WIFE. COULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE 16. COMMITTEE IS BEING
COULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE 16. COMMITTEE IS BEING INVESTIGATED BY THE 16
16. COMMITTEE IS BEING INVESTIGATED BY THE 16 COMMITTEE. HE WAS THE SOLE
INVESTIGATED BY THE 16 COMMITTEE. HE WAS THE SOLE JUSTICE TO OPPOSE
COMMITTEE. HE WAS THE SOLE JUSTICE TO OPPOSE RELEASING NATIONAL ARCHIVES
JUSTICE TO OPPOSE RELEASING NATIONAL ARCHIVES RECORDS FROM THE TRUMP WHITE
RELEASING NATIONAL ARCHIVES RECORDS FROM THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE TO THE COMMITTEE. WHY
RECORDS FROM THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE TO THE COMMITTEE. WHY THE DEMOCRATS NOT TAKING A
HOUSE TO THE COMMITTEE. WHY THE DEMOCRATS NOT TAKING A STRONGER POSITION HERE
THE DEMOCRATS NOT TAKING A STRONGER POSITION HERE ON CLARENCE,
STRONGER POSITION HERE ON CLARENCE, THOMAS.
ON CLARENCE, THOMAS. THAT‘S ALSO BEYOND ME. I
THOMAS. THAT‘S ALSO BEYOND ME. I THINK, YOU KNOW, THE AMOUNT OF
THAT‘S ALSO BEYOND ME. I THINK, YOU KNOW, THE AMOUNT OF LATITUDE SUPREME COURT,
THINK, YOU KNOW, THE AMOUNT OF LATITUDE SUPREME COURT, JUSTICES HAVE IN MATTERS, LIKE
LATITUDE SUPREME COURT, JUSTICES HAVE IN MATTERS, LIKE THIS SHOULD CONCERN,
JUSTICES HAVE IN MATTERS, LIKE THIS SHOULD CONCERN, EVERYONE. THIS HAS BEEN AN
THIS SHOULD CONCERN, EVERYONE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM AT THE COURT
EVERYONE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ONGOING PROBLEM AT THE COURT FOR A LONG TIME.
ONGOING PROBLEM AT THE COURT FOR A LONG TIME. THEY DON‘T DISCLOSE
FOR A LONG TIME. THEY DON‘T DISCLOSE THEIR FINANCIAL
THEY DON‘T DISCLOSE THEIR FINANCIAL HOLDINGS WITH WITH ENOUGH
THEIR FINANCIAL HOLDINGS WITH WITH ENOUGH TRANSPARENCY.
HOLDINGS WITH WITH ENOUGH TRANSPARENCY. THEY
TRANSPARENCY. THEY DECIDE
THEY DECIDE INDEPENDENTLY, WHETHER OR NOT
DECIDE INDEPENDENTLY, WHETHER OR NOT TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM
INDEPENDENTLY, WHETHER OR NOT TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM MAY NOT HAVE A CONFLICT.
TO RECUSE THEMSELVES FROM MAY NOT HAVE A CONFLICT. CLARENCE THOMAS DISSENTED, IN
MAY NOT HAVE A CONFLICT. CLARENCE THOMAS DISSENTED, IN THAT RULING AND
CLARENCE THOMAS DISSENTED, IN THAT RULING AND PROVIDED,
THAT RULING AND PROVIDED, ABSOLUTELY NO SUBSTANCE.
PROVIDED, ABSOLUTELY NO SUBSTANCE. AS TO WHY HE WAS DECIDING HE
ABSOLUTELY NO SUBSTANCE. AS TO WHY HE WAS DECIDING HE WAS JUST REGISTERED AS THE
AS TO WHY HE WAS DECIDING HE WAS JUST REGISTERED AS THE LONE DISSENTER
WAS JUST REGISTERED AS THE LONE DISSENTER AND AND
LONE DISSENTER AND AND THIS JUST ISN‘T, YOU KNOW,
AND AND THIS JUST ISN‘T, YOU KNOW, THIS ISN‘T POLITICS
THIS JUST ISN‘T, YOU KNOW, THIS ISN‘T POLITICS PER SE.
THIS ISN‘T POLITICS PER SE. THIS IS ABOUT ONE OF
PER SE. THIS IS ABOUT ONE OF THREE, BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL
THIS IS ABOUT ONE OF THREE, BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
THREE, BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONING EFFECTIVELY.
GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONING EFFECTIVELY. AND AND YOU HAVE JENNY
FUNCTIONING EFFECTIVELY. AND AND YOU HAVE JENNY THOMAS AS AN ACTIVE
AND AND YOU HAVE JENNY THOMAS AS AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT IN AN
THOMAS AS AN ACTIVE PARTICIPANT IN AN INSURRECTION, THAT WAS PART
PARTICIPANT IN AN INSURRECTION, THAT WAS PART OF A LARGER FACT PATTERN IN
INSURRECTION, THAT WAS PART OF A LARGER FACT PATTERN IN PALEMBANG. A COUP
OF A LARGER FACT PATTERN IN PALEMBANG. A COUP AND HER HUSBAND IS RULING
PALEMBANG. A COUP AND HER HUSBAND IS RULING ON
AND HER HUSBAND IS RULING ON ON ESSENTIAL MATTER.
ON ON ESSENTIAL MATTER. DERS, INVOLVING THE
ON ESSENTIAL MATTER. DERS, INVOLVING THE TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION
DERS, INVOLVING THE TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION TO OTHER BRANCHES OF THE
TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION TO OTHER BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO
TO OTHER BRANCHES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT CHECKS AND BALANCES ARE
MAKE SURE THAT CHECKS AND BALANCES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY
CHECKS AND BALANCES ARE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND THEY BOTH ARE GETTING IN
FUNCTIONING PROPERLY AND THEY BOTH ARE GETTING IN THE WAY OF THAT.
AND THEY BOTH ARE GETTING IN THE WAY OF THAT. THE
THE WAY OF THAT. THE SUPREME COURT CONFLICT OF
THE SUPREME COURT CONFLICT OF INTEREST RULES NEED TO BE
SUPREME COURT CONFLICT OF INTEREST RULES NEED TO BE OVERHAULED AND I HOPE THEY
INTEREST RULES NEED TO BE OVERHAULED AND I HOPE THEY SUBPOENA JANEE THOMPSON,
OVERHAULED AND I HOPE THEY SUBPOENA JANEE THOMPSON, A GREAT JENNY THOMAS JUST AS
SUBPOENA JANEE THOMPSON, A GREAT JENNY THOMAS JUST AS SOON AS SHE CAN BE SUBPOENAED
A GREAT JENNY THOMAS JUST AS SOON AS SHE CAN BE SUBPOENAED AND NOT WAIT AROUND.
SOON AS SHE CAN BE SUBPOENAED AND NOT WAIT AROUND. JUST TO BE CLEAR.
AND NOT WAIT AROUND. JUST TO BE CLEAR. WE‘VE SEEN THE TEXT JENNY
JUST TO BE CLEAR. WE‘VE SEEN THE TEXT JENNY THOMAS WAS CLEARLY FROM THE
WE‘VE SEEN THE TEXT JENNY THOMAS WAS CLEARLY FROM THE TEXT
THOMAS WAS CLEARLY FROM THE TEXT INVOLVING HERSELF IN AN
AS FOR THE INSURRECTION. SHE
AS FOR THE INSURRECTION. SHE CLAIMS. SHE WASN‘T AT THE
AS FOR THE INSURRECTION. SHE CLAIMS. SHE WASN‘T AT THE CAPITOL. SHE SAYS, SHE WENT
CLAIMS. SHE WASN‘T AT THE CAPITOL. SHE SAYS, SHE WENT HOME. SHE WAS COLD. SHE
CAPITOL. SHE SAYS, SHE WENT HOME. SHE WAS COLD. SHE ATTENDED THE TRUMP RALLY, BUT
HOME. SHE WAS COLD. SHE ATTENDED THE TRUMP RALLY, BUT DIDN‘T STAY FOR A SPEECH
ATTENDED THE TRUMP RALLY, BUT DIDN‘T STAY FOR A SPEECH BECAUSE IT WAS COLD OUTSIDE,
DIDN‘T STAY FOR A SPEECH BECAUSE IT WAS COLD OUTSIDE, BUT WE NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT
BECAUSE IT WAS COLD OUTSIDE, BUT WE NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT HER ACTIVITIES, ON JANUARY,
BUT WE NEED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT HER ACTIVITIES, ON JANUARY, THE 6TH, OF COURSE JILL,
HER ACTIVITIES, ON JANUARY, THE 6TH, OF COURSE JILL, ANOTHER WEIRD PARALLEL BETWEEN
THE 6TH, OF COURSE JILL, ANOTHER WEIRD PARALLEL BETWEEN WATERGATE AND NOW IS THAT THE
ANOTHER WEIRD PARALLEL BETWEEN WATERGATE AND NOW IS THAT THE SUPREME COURT RULED
WATERGATE AND NOW IS THAT THE SUPREME COURT RULED 820 IN
SUPREME COURT RULED 820 IN 1974
820 IN 1974 TO FORCE NIXON TO HAND OVER
1974 TO FORCE NIXON TO HAND OVER HIS WHITE HOUSE TAPES AND IT
TO FORCE NIXON TO HAND OVER HIS WHITE HOUSE TAPES AND IT WAS EIGHT TO ZERO BECAUSE
HIS WHITE HOUSE TAPES AND IT WAS EIGHT TO ZERO BECAUSE JUSTICE REHNQUIST RECUSED
WAS EIGHT TO ZERO BECAUSE JUSTICE REHNQUIST RECUSED HIMSELF BECAUSE OF A CONFLICT
JUSTICE REHNQUIST RECUSED HIMSELF BECAUSE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST HE HAD HE HAD
HIMSELF BECAUSE OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST HE HAD HE HAD WORKED FOR THE AG AT THE TIME.
A 20 ON TRUMP‘S WHITE HOUSE
A 20 ON TRUMP‘S WHITE HOUSE RECORD. HAD JUSTICE THOMAS
A 20 ON TRUMP‘S WHITE HOUSE RECORD. HAD JUSTICE THOMAS RECUSED HIMSELF OVER HIS
RECORD. HAD JUSTICE THOMAS RECUSED HIMSELF OVER HIS CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST,
RECUSED HIMSELF OVER HIS CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BUT HE REFUSED
CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BUT HE REFUSED WHILE ALMOST CERTAINLY KNOWING
BUT HE REFUSED WHILE ALMOST CERTAINLY KNOWING HIS WIFE WAS TEXTING ABOUT
WHILE ALMOST CERTAINLY KNOWING HIS WIFE WAS TEXTING ABOUT COOS WITH THE TRUMP WHITE
HIS WIFE WAS TEXTING ABOUT COOS WITH THE TRUMP WHITE MEAN, THERE‘S NO RULES FOR
COOS WITH THE TRUMP WHITE MEAN, THERE‘S NO RULES FOR THESE SUPREME COURT
MEAN, THERE‘S NO RULES FOR THESE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. THERE‘S NO CONFLICT
THESE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. THERE‘S NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST. GUIDELINES
JUSTICE. THERE‘S NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST. GUIDELINES THAT SUPPOSED TO REGULATE
OF INTEREST. GUIDELINES THAT SUPPOSED TO REGULATE THEMSELVES.
THAT SUPPOSED TO REGULATE THEMSELVES. THAT‘S TRUE. AND I WANT TO
THEMSELVES. THAT‘S TRUE. AND I WANT TO POINT OUT BEFORE I
THAT‘S TRUE. AND I WANT TO POINT OUT BEFORE I ADDRESS THE ETHICS ISSUE
POINT OUT BEFORE I ADDRESS THE ETHICS ISSUE THAT
ADDRESS THE ETHICS ISSUE THAT GINNY, THOMAS‘S SUBPOENA, IF
THAT GINNY, THOMAS‘S SUBPOENA, IF IT,
GINNY, THOMAS‘S SUBPOENA, IF IT, TO THAT, OR HER INVITATION
IT, TO THAT, OR HER INVITATION IS FOR HER
TO THAT, OR HER INVITATION IS FOR HER KNOWLEDGE AS A
IS FOR HER KNOWLEDGE AS A PARTICIPANT
KNOWLEDGE AS A PARTICIPANT IN A POSSIBLE COUP,
PARTICIPANT IN A POSSIBLE COUP, WHETHER IT WAS
IN A POSSIBLE COUP, WHETHER IT WAS AT THE CAPITOL. SHE DIDN‘T GO
WHETHER IT WAS AT THE CAPITOL. SHE DIDN‘T GO TO THE CAPITAL, BUT SHE
AT THE CAPITOL. SHE DIDN‘T GO TO THE CAPITAL, BUT SHE MAY HAVE HAD A PART IN
TO THE CAPITAL, BUT SHE MAY HAVE HAD A PART IN PLANNING. THERE‘S TALK ABOUT
MAY HAVE HAD A PART IN PLANNING. THERE‘S TALK ABOUT HER HAVING PAID FOR A BUSLOAD
PLANNING. THERE‘S TALK ABOUT HER HAVING PAID FOR A BUSLOAD OF PEOPLE
HER HAVING PAID FOR A BUSLOAD OF PEOPLE CERTAINLY. HER TEXTS ARE
OF PEOPLE CERTAINLY. HER TEXTS ARE EVIDENCE OF HER PARTICIPATION.
CERTAINLY. HER TEXTS ARE EVIDENCE OF HER PARTICIPATION. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER
EVIDENCE OF HER PARTICIPATION. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING THE WIFE OF A SUPREME
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HER BEING THE WIFE OF A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. SHE‘S NOT BEING
BEING THE WIFE OF A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE. SHE‘S NOT BEING SUBPOENAED IN THAT ROLE
COURT JUSTICE. SHE‘S NOT BEING SUBPOENAED IN THAT ROLE AND SHE SHOULD HAVE NO MORE
SUBPOENAED IN THAT ROLE AND SHE SHOULD HAVE NO MORE PROTECTION.
AND SHE SHOULD HAVE NO MORE PROTECTION. IAN
PROTECTION. IAN AGAINST A SUBPOENA
IAN AGAINST A SUBPOENA THAN ANY
AGAINST A SUBPOENA THAN ANY OTHER PERSON WHO SENDS
THAN ANY OTHER PERSON WHO SENDS TEXT LIKE THAT
OTHER PERSON WHO SENDS TEXT LIKE THAT AS TO
TEXT LIKE THAT AS TO THE
AS TO THE ISSUE, THERE IS NO RULE
THE ISSUE, THERE IS NO RULE OF ETHICS FOR THE SUPREME
ISSUE, THERE IS NO RULE OF ETHICS FOR THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH IS ABSURD, EVERY
OF ETHICS FOR THE SUPREME COURT, WHICH IS ABSURD, EVERY OTHER COURT SAYS THAT
COURT, WHICH IS ABSURD, EVERY OTHER COURT SAYS THAT IF YOU‘RE OUT OF TIME,
OTHER COURT SAYS THAT IF YOU‘RE OUT OF TIME, JOE, I‘M SO SORRY JUMPING.
IF YOU‘RE OUT OF TIME, JOE, I‘M SO SORRY JUMPING. WHERE ARE THE TIME, BUT YOU‘RE
JOE, I‘M SO SORRY JUMPING. WHERE ARE THE TIME, BUT YOU‘RE RIGHT. IT‘S ABSURD
WHERE ARE THE TIME, BUT YOU‘RE RIGHT. IT‘S ABSURD THAT THERE IS AN THAT CODE I
RIGHT. IT‘S ABSURD THAT THERE IS AN THAT CODE I SHOULD POINT OUT QUICKLY. I
THAT THERE IS AN THAT CODE I SHOULD POINT OUT QUICKLY. I HATE DEFENDING, JENNY THOMAS,
SHOULD POINT OUT QUICKLY. I HATE DEFENDING, JENNY THOMAS, BUT THE BUS THING HAS BEEN
HATE DEFENDING, JENNY THOMAS, BUT THE BUS THING HAS BEEN DEBUNKED. BUT THERE ARE MANY
BUT THE BUS THING HAS BEEN DEBUNKED. BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER QUESTIONS. WE DO. NEED
DEBUNKED. BUT THERE ARE MANY OTHER QUESTIONS. WE DO. NEED TO ASK HER ABOUT JILL
OTHER QUESTIONS. WE DO. NEED TO ASK HER ABOUT JILL WINE BANKS AND TIM O‘BRIEN.
TO ASK HER ABOUT JILL WINE BANKS AND TIM O‘BRIEN. THANK YOU SO MUCH.