THE VICTIMS OF THE FAMILIES AS
WELL.
CHARLES WATSON OUT IN DADEVILLE.
THANK YOU.
A NEW WARNING FROM ELON MUSK
ABOUT BIAS FROM ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE.
HERE’S A CLIP.
>> WHAT IS HAPPENING IS THEY ARE
TRAINING THE AI TO LIVE.
IT IS BAD.
>> THAT IS EXACTLY RIGHT.
>> AND TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION.
>> YES.
NOT TO SAY WHAT THE DATA IS
ACTUALLY SAYING.
>> HOW DID IT GET THIS WAY? YOU FUNDED IT AT THE BEGINNING.
YOU FUNDED IT AT THE BEGINNING.
WHAT HAPPENED?
THE MAC TO LIE OR NOT TO LIVE.
LET’S START WITH YOU, GUY.
>> PEOPLE LIVE.
AI DIRECTED BY HUMANS WILL
LIKELY HAVE SOME DISHONESTY IN
THE MIX.
I WAS THINKING ABOUT THIS LAST
NIGHT.
WE HAD A BIG CONVERSATION ABOUT
AI ON THE TABLE YESTERDAY.
I AM NOT SAYING THAT THEY ARE A
LEGITIMATE CONCERNS AT ALL, BUT
I WONDER HOW MANY THINGS ARE
ALSO THINGS THAT PEOPLE SET UPON
THE ADVENT AND THE RISE OF THE
INTERNET AS WELL.
THERE WILL BE AN EXPLOSION OF
NEW INFORMATION, SOME OF WHICH
MAY NOT BE TRUE AND SO ON AND SO
FORTH.
I JUST WONDER, IS THERE A
PARALLEL THERE?
ARE WE MAY BE GOING TOO DEEP
INTO THE NEGATIVITY ON AI AND
OVERLOOKING SOME OF THE POSITIVE
DEVELOPMENTS BECAUSE PEOPLE MADE
THAT MISTAKE WITH THE INTERNET
AS WELL.
NOT TO SAY IT WAS NOT A
DOWNSIDE, BUT MAYBE WE ARE
GETTING OURSELVES A LITTLE HYPED
UP.
I DON’T KNOW.
>> DOCTOR SAFIRE.
>> I THINK THAT WE SAW A GLIMPSE
OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN WHEN AI
BECOMES MORE PREVALENT.
LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED WITH COVID
AND SOCIAL MEDIA IN GENERAL WITH
THE CENSORING BY THE HUMANS
CONTROLLING THE ALGORITHM.
I THINK AS YOU CONTINUE TO
PROGRAM ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
YOU WILL SEE THE SAME BIAS AND
CENSORSHIP.
IT WILL BE THERE HUMANS MAKING
SURE YOU ARE DOING YOUR OWN
RESEARCH AND NOT HEAVILY
DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU ARE
FINDING.
SAME THING HAPPENS IN A GOOGLE
SEARCH.
IT DOES NOT NECESSARILY GIVE YOU
EVERYTHING THAT IS OUT THERE ON
THE TOPIC.
IF YOU ARE RESEARCHING SOMETHING
YOU HAVE TO GO TO THE SOURCES
BECAUSE GOOGLE ITSELF SENSORS
THINGS.
>> I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN AND
JARGON POINT AS WELL.
THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THIS AND TECHNOLOGY IS
IT PRESUMES TO REPLACE US.
WE ARE NOT LOOKING AT THIS AS A
RESOURCE THAT WE THEN CONSUME
AND USE AND PUT OUT THERE.
IT MANAGES THE INFORMATION.
IT WOULD ACT ON THE INFORMATION.
WE HEAR ABOUT THE LOSS OF JOBS.
WHAT IS OUR VALUE AS HUMAN
BEINGS.
THAT IS THE LARGER QUESTION.
THE BEST QUESTION EVER THAT YOU
HAVE TO ASK IS, YOU KNOW, WHAT
IS THE POINT OF WHAT WE DO AS
HUMAN BEINGS.
>> THIS AFFECTS THAT QUESTION.
>> TWO GUYS POINT, I WAS READING
AN ARTICLE TODAY ABOUT HOW THE
MILITARY, THE MILITARY GENERAL
WAS QUOTED SAYING THEY HAVE
ALREADY BEGUN TO IMPLEMENT AI IN
WAYS THAT WOULD DO WARGAMING AND
CALCULATE THE POSSIBILITIES OF
OUTCOMES THAT ARE ADVERSARY.
AI CAN THINK FASTER IN REAL TIME
TO HELP US ON THE BATTLEFIELD
SPIRIT MAYBE THERE ARE SOME
AREAS THAT WE SHOULD SAY -- ON
THE OTHER HAND, YOU RAISE A
POINT.
DO WE WANT AI IN CHARGE OF OUR
WARS?
>> THE ALGORITHM COULD COME UP
WITH ALL OF THESE POSSIBILITIES.
THE HUMANS EXPERIENCE CAN BRING
SOMETHING ELSE TO THE TABLE.
THEY NEED TO BE USED IN
CONJUNCTION.
ONE IS NOT TO BE REPLACED BY THE
OTHER.
>> WHAT ARE THEIR GUARDRAILS AND
WHO DECIDES?
>> 2000 SPACE ODYSSEY.