LIZ: WHITE HOUSE, SAYING THIS IS
A DRAMATIC CONCESSION, A NEW
IMMIGRATION PROPOSAL, TRUMP
POPULATION OF 1.8 MILLION
PEOPLE, TEAL THAT PRESIDENT
WANTS WOULD REQUIRE CONGRESS TO
OFFICIALS, THEY WANT A DEAL THAT
IN THIS DEAL TO END CHAIN
A PATH TO CITIZENSHIP FOR 1.8
MILLION PEOPLE, COMING OUT OF
THE WHITE HOUSE, WE BRING IN
SHERIFF DAVID CLARK, WHAT DO YOU
THINK OF THIS DEAL?
WHITE HOUSE SAYING THIS IS A BIG
CONCESSION.
>> I THINK IT IS, THIS IS A
NEGOTIATE, THAT MEANS YOU DON'T
GET WHAT YOU WANT, WE'RE NOT
GOING TO DEPORT.
YOU CAN GETS 3 OUT OF 4 THINGS
THAT YOU WANT, YOU HAVE TO LOOK
AT THAT AS A WIN, DEMOCRATS MAY
STILL BALK AT THIS, THEY HAVE
DUG THEIR HEELS IN CHAIN
MIGRATION, AND NO FUNDING FOR
THE WALL, AND VISA LOTTERY
PROGRAM.
THIS SHOWS THAT WHITE HOUSE IS
SOMETHING.
LIZ: IF THE DEMOCRATS REJECT IT,
THEN WHAT?
WASHINGTON, THEY WAITED UNTIL
MCCONNELL, WILL HAVE TO LOOK
LONG AND HARD ABOUT THIS THING
THAT FILIBUSTER, MAYBE END THAT.
THEY ARE NOT TRYING TO STEAM
ROLL THE DEMOCRATS, THEY ARE
TRYING TO BE REASONABLE, IT THE
DEMOCRATS THAT ARE BEING
UNREASONABLE.
LIZ: THE VIM BREAK --
IMMIGRATION PROBLEM HAS BEEN
DECADES IN THE MAKING.
PRESIDENT IS TRYING TO FIX IT.
AND ALSO HE WANTS TO FIX FAMILY
COME IN VISA FAMILY MIGRATION
POLICIES AND ATTACKED INNOCENT
AMERICANS.
WHAT HE IS SAYING NEW CITIZEN
CAN ONLY SPONSOR IMMEDIATE
FAMILIES NOT OUTER CIRCLE OF
RELATIVES.
>> THAT REASONABLE, WITH CHAIN
AND GIRLFRIENDS, THAT HAS TO
STOP.
AGAIN, THIS IS SAY CONCESSION,
YOU CAN HAVE DEBATE IN CONGRESS
AND AMERICAN PUBLIC TO WHETHER
IT GOES TOO FAR IN TERMS OF
OFFERING TO SOMETHING IN
DEMOCRATS.
THINK IT IS OFFER TOO MUCH WE'LL
SEE.
YEARS.
AND BORDER PROTECT AGENTS AT THE
BORDERS AS WELL AS MORE
IMMIGRATION JUDGES.
WE KNOW THAT CASE LOAD THERE IS
OVERWHELMING.
IN TERMS OF TO DEAL WITH THE
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.
HOW ABOUT A BORDER WALL WITH
CANADA?
>> WELL, YOU KNOW THAT IS FIRST
BUT MAIN THING IS THAT THE
PROBLEM IS AT SOUTHERN BORDER,
IF THERE IS A PROB LEDGE
IF THERE IS A PROBLLEDGE
IF THERE IS A PROBLEMDGE
NORTHERN BORDER UNOTHING
SOMETHING I HEARD OF IN PAST,
HARD-LINE ON.
I AM GLAD TO SEE, HE IS HOLDING
THAT LINE, 10 OR 12 YEARS BEFORE
DREAMERS ARE ELIGIBLE, THIS IS
REASONABLE.
THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT TO LOOK
FOR IN NEGOTIATION, YOU WANT A
REASONABLE APPROACH TO WHAT YOU
ARE TRYING TO ASK FOR AND WHAT
YOU CAN GET.
IF YOU CAN'T GET IT YOU CAN DRAW
HARD-LINES IN ALL THIS STUFF,
YOU CAN SAY, NOTHING FOR THE
DREAMERS, DEPORT THEM, YOU COULD
SAY NO CHAIN MIGRATION, NO VISA
LOTTERY AND A WALL AS LONG AS WE
WANT IT, THAT IT IS.
THAT IS NOT NEGOTIATING.
LIZ: DO YOU LIKE THIS DEAL?
>> FROM WHAT I HEARD, YOU KNOW,
JUST LIKE YOU, WE'RE JUST
HEARING, I NEED TO KNOW MORE
DETAILS.
THIS IS NEGOTIATION, AND SO I
THINK FROM THAT STAND POINT,
WHAT I AM HEARING, I THINK CAN
PASS.
THAT IS IMPORTANT, WHAT CAN
PASS.
NOT WHAT DO YOU WANT, BUT WHAT
CAN YOU GET PASSED.